THIS BLOG IS UPDATED AS INFORMATION IS BROUGHT TO US AND IS THEREFORE NOT NECESSARILY IN CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER. ALL INFORMATION IS SUBSEQUENTLY FILED UNDER SPECIFIC "SUBJECTS" (WHICH CAN BE FOUND AT THE RIGHT HAND SIDE OF THE BLOG) FOR EASE OF CONTINUITY.

Tuesday, February 8, 2011

Rezoning decision being made by too few people

Monday, February 7 2011
Flying Shingle

Dear Editor,

The Under-represented Islands

As residents of Gabriola and surrounding Islands, we find ourselves in difficult circumstances.

The one important issue which our local Islands Trust committee deals with is once again being dealt with by one elected Trustee.

The primary function of our Islands Trust is to act as a land-use planning body for most of the Gulf Islands. Gabriola and surrounding islands have only two elected representatives to the Trust, who speak for a population of approximately five thousand people. If one of those trustees finds themselves to be in conflict of interest on any matter, they must excuse themselves from the planning and decision making functions of the Trust, and shift the full responsibility of that role to the one remaining Trustee, who must then carry on as the sole voice for our community.

We currently find ourselves in exactly this situation. On a matter of major community importance, that being the potential rezoning of a significant piece of property to accommodate the wishes of a self-appointed, not for profit society, Trustee Deborah Ferens has discovered herself, through no fault of her own, to be in conflict of interest in the decision to rezone. She has, rightly and properly, removed herself from the process, leaving the decision in the hands of Sheila Malcolmson, the only remaining elected Trustee.

Both Trustee’s actions are being vigorously and continuously defended, but for me it is not about the actions of a couple of Trustees. I am quite certain that they are acting correctly according to the letter of the law and therefore do not need to be defended. However, there is something much bigger at stake here.

What is being forgotten in all of this is the fact that we, the residents - those of us who make this place our home - who work and live without the help of handouts or donations, remain totally under-represented in this process. In fact we are being treated with disdain, as though we are in the way and unnecessary. That fact is the underlying problem, and it is absolutely and totally indefensible.Those who think it is just fine to hand out millions of dollars’ worth of zoning in such an irresponsible manner, should hang their heads in shame. Those who think it is okay to force our only remaining elected Islands Trustee to take full responsibility for making a decision that will affect our entire community for decades to come, need to go back to school and take a civics course. Those who think it is acceptable to allow the Islands Trust, represented by one elected person, to make long term planning decisions, over which they have no power of enforcement, should wonder at their own future stability on this island.

The question we need to ask ourselves is: are we content with reactive zoning and unenforceable bylaws or do we want what we deserve, real and inclusive proactive planning based on true representation?This is not an easy question to answer, as the solution involves conviction and dedication and requires us to put aside our comfort and complaining, and put in the work and effort required to make the change. If we are not willing to put in the work and effort, then all there is for us to engage in is endless complaining and name calling.

It is time for all of us to stand up and say enough is enough! We are no longer going to be governed by self-appointed special interest groups and not-for profit societies, who are determined to have their own way by shouting the loudest and the longest. It is time for reason and democracy to prevail.So I guess the real question we need to ask ourselves is, and it’s a big one:

How do we want to be remembered by future generations?

Berni Sperling


Since when do we divorce the right answer from an honest one?”

“Professor Norman Corbett:
 Since when do we divorce the right answer from an honest one?” – a critique
by Muriel Weins
The Flying Shingle
Monday, February 7 2011

Long ago, when I entered university, I expected to be presented with a view of the world which would somehow cast all of existence in a different light – to actually be enlightened, in the original meaning of the word. Of course, to my dismay, it turned out to be just a replay of high school, except that nobody gave a damn whether you studied or not.

I had a flash of recognition when I watched this film. The theology teacher, who somehow stumbled upon the methodology to truly enlighten his students, of course brought down on his head the wrath of the university. It has been centuries since the university was actually a place where a different way of seeing the world was actually on the curriculum. Theological studies, like all other “courses”, have become mere instruments of indoctrination, teaching students to cut the world up into categories and forcing them to disown their innate wisdom.

The protagonist of this film had discovered how to deprogram his students, leading them, through astonishment and insight, out of the cultural hypnotic trance and into tenure of their own minds. He showed them how to enter their own humanity. He gave them a taste of the experience of Self which is supposed to be the goal of all religion. He was an ecstatic; an artist of the mind.

His vision of Truth eventually attracted to his classroom the luminaries of the artistic tradition. How could the university, a mere factory of degrees understand that? So they took away his tenure, his right to teach, and have refused to tell anyone on what grounds they refuse to allow him to teach. He was wrong, in their view, because his method created “knowledge” which did not fit into the pattern of “received opinion”; could not be analysed, described, categorised, measured, or fit into any model of “information”.

This will always be how someone will be treated, who interferes with the current cultural belief system.

A great documentary - part of the gracious presentation of films generously organised by Tsiporah and Paul Grignon.

Monday, February 7, 2011

Public Information Meeting

Have you had questions around the necessity of the proposed new Urgent Care Medical Clinic? Or concerns over the financial viability of building and maintaining such a structure? Perhaps you have been wondering about why other perfectly acceptable sites have been discounted? Or have concerns about, or oppose, the by-law application for rezoning from “forestry” to “institutional” that this building entails? Do you have reservations about what price Gabriolans will have to pay for the “gift” of the land being donated for the clinic.

Most individuals on Gabriola have serious concerns that have been raised within the community over the last several months, or years. An on-going campaign of intimidation using a variety of unacceptable methods has attempted to silence these concerns. It hasn’t worked!

We will be holding a
PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING
(NO GHCS/GHCF AFFILIATION) 
THURSDAY FEBRUARY 10 at 7:00 p.m. 
ROLLO SENIORS CENTRE 
We will provide a full and accurate disclosure of information based on extensive research and primary source material, pertaining to the inception, development, and proposed building of the Urgent Care Medical Clinic, including rezoning issues. This will be an opportunity for the people of Gabriola, Mudge and Decourcey to participate in an open forum in a safe and supportive environment. All forms of ridicule, bullying, intimidation or fear factor techniques will not be accepted. Anyone attempting to do so will be asked to leave.

This is your island, your money,
your community, your health!  
YOUR MEETING.

For more info please contact Shena Meadowcroft or Tony Gibson (250) 247-9354 or shenam@shaw.ca www.proposedgabriolaclinic.blogspot.com